By: Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C.
Prior to the election, we were advising our estate planning clients regarding the bleak prospects
of reduced valuation discounts under the IRC §2704 proposed regulations and the potential rollback
of the Unified Credit under what many had assumed would be a Democratic
administration. My how times have changed. Now we are re-evaluating our various preelection
strategies to determine which might still be viable if the Trump administration makes
good on its campaign promise of repealing estate taxes. It should be noted that both the Trump
tax proposal and the House Republicans “Better Way” plan advocate repeal of the “death” tax.
But the provisions governing the repeal seem to differ somewhat. The Trump version would
repeal estate taxes, but does not mention GST or gift taxes, whereas the House plan would
repeal estate taxes and GST, but does not mention gift taxes.
The Trump tax plan would also impose a capital gains tax on appreciated assets (excluding
small businesses and family farms) that are held until death, and are valued at over $10 Million
(although it is unclear whether that capital gains tax would be imposed at death or upon
subsequent disposition of those assets by the heirs of the estate in the form of a carry-over basis
as to those assets). The House plan retains the current basis step-up at death concepts. How
these substantial differences are reconciled in the final bill can only be guesswork.
Meanwhile, the 2704 proposed regulations have received much comment and criticism from the
business and tax professional community, and, according to most commentators, will likely not
get finalized in their proposed form or, perhaps, in any form, in the near future.
Even if Congress and President Trump can reach agreement on the transfer tax repeal or
reform, there is no assurance that the Senate can get sufficient votes for cloture under its rules,
or that the bill can get through the Senate under the budget resolution or reconciliation
legislation exception with less than the required sixty votes. Enactment may take some time
and the effective date of the final provisions may be phased in, thus mitigating any benefits of
that repeal or reform for transfers that occur prior to full effectiveness of the repeal or reform.
Finally, even if full repeal of the federal transfer taxes is effectuated, those or similar tax
regimes may be revived sometime in the future. Any plans implemented before the repeal may,
or may not, result in tax savings under any such revived tax regime.
Some of the pre-election planning for clients included proposed inter-family gifts or other
transfers. Some clients were motivated to make gifts before the Section 2704(b) regulations
could materially alter available discounts. Others had important goals beyond tax savings.
Making decisions in a changing environment is always challenging, and each family must
consider its own goals in making them. Here are some factors that we suggest you should
1. The perceived value of any and all non-tax benefits arising under the plan, including,
perhaps, asset protection, business succession, or asset management issues;
2. The additional costs to be incurred in the implementation of the plan;
3. The annual maintenance and compliance costs and inconveniences relating to the plan;
4. The expected term or duration of the plan;
5. The amount of anticipated disruption or distortion in family relationships associated
with the plan; and
6. The impact of any state inheritance or estate taxes to which the client might be
The decision of whether to proceed with, modify or abandon pre-election planning is not simple
and certainly requires individual analysis on a client by client basis. We intend to continue to
monitor and analyze these developments, and, particularly, the impact upon estate planning
projects that are currently underway. For our clients who do not already have some sort of
planning in process, we suggest that you review your current estate plan and consider whether
it still reflects your wishes and meets your current needs. If you would like our assistance with
that review, please contact us.
Disclaimer: This communication is for informational purposes only, and is not intended to
substitute for the reader obtaining and acting upon tax advice that is specific to the
circumstances of the taxpayer as obtained from the taxpayer’s own professional.
Bill Clarke – email@example.com – 602.262.5886
John Christian – firstname.lastname@example.org – 602.262.5805
Jack Rudel – email@example.com – 602.262.5951
Otto Shill – firstname.lastname@example.org – 602.262.5956
Paul Valentine – email@example.com – 602.262.5940